![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wiomsa.org\/wiompan\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/South-Africa1-300x238.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Protected areas, according to the\u00a0International Union for Conservation of Nature<\/a>, are clearly defined geographical spaces set aside to conserve nature, ecosystem services and cultural values. They are important to reduce biodiversity loss and protect sources of food, clean water and medicines. They also offer protection from the impacts of natural disasters.<\/p>\n The recent\u00a0Protected Planet 2020 report<\/a>\u00a0found a 42% increase in protected area coverage between 2010 and 2019. This includes a 68% increase in coastal and marine protected areas over the same decade. But the\u00a0Living Planet Report 2020<\/a>shows that biodiversity is still being lost at alarming rates. It notes an average decrease of 68% in global population sizes of many species in the past 50 years. Not surprisingly, the same report states that \u201cour relationship with nature is broken\u201d.<\/p>\n The central challenge facing conservation is that it\u2019s not only an ecological, but also a social issue. If the local context and priorities of those who most directly rely on natural resources for their survival isn\u2019t considered, conservation efforts will continue to fail. Therefore, many have called for a\u00a0new conservation movement<\/a>\u00a0which incorporates the interests and priorities of local and\u00a0Indigenous people<\/a>. This is what the\u00a0Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework<\/a>\u00a0recognises and strives for.<\/p>\n Recent research<\/a>\u00a0has emphasised the importance of community-conserved areas. These are protected areas governed, managed and conserved by custodian Indigenous people and local communities. But so far, while about\u00a08% of the global marine environment<\/a>\u00a0is currently protected,\u00a0only 1%<\/a>\u00a0of these protected areas involve custodian Indigenous people and local communities.<\/p>\n In Africa a similar trend exists. Only\u00a00.01%<\/a>\u00a0of the current coastal and marine protected areas (which cover\u00a017.7%<\/a>\u00a0of the coastal and marine environment) have some form of community stewardship. This despite many conservationists and initiatives in the region pointing to the success of\u00a0community-level conservation action<\/a>.<\/p>\n In a\u00a0recent paper<\/a>, my colleagues and I explored what prevents and enables community protection of coastal and marine areas in South Africa. We reviewed global and South African literature to identify common factors in these types of initiatives. We then refined this list based on interviews with a variety of people involved in conservation in South Africa.<\/p>\n We found that local communities can conserve areas when:<\/p>\n The success of community-conserved areas requires self-motivated local champions who can get things done and get people involved. It also takes good communication. Initial and ongoing support from the state, non-governmental, private sector and civil society partners is essential too.<\/p>\n A potential barrier to success is the relationship between communities and partners \u2013 especially the government. In South Africa, strained relations stem largely from the \u201cpeople-free\u201d conservation approaches taken during the colonial and\u00a0apartheid<\/a>\u00a0regimes. Under apartheid, black people were denied access to and use of land and resources. Many communities were even evicted in the name of conservation.<\/p>\n Therefore, a key enabler will be improving community perceptions and support for conservation by providing redress for these communities. Also, where needed, cultural institutions must be revitalised. These include cultural rules and practices that regulate the use of natural resources, respect for and effectiveness of traditional leaders to enforce this. If this is achieved, and communities can receive a source of income or livelihood from conserved areas, they are more likely to protect them. But it\u2019s important to monitor initiatives to prevent the capture of benefits by a few local elites.<\/p>\n Reducing biodiversity loss and sustainably meeting the needs of people means having stronger enablers in place and reducing constraints. Conservation should empower communities to be valued and effective in decision-making and management activities.<\/p>\n Technical and financial support should be present from the outset.\u00a0Madagascar<\/a>, which has\u00a0178 locally managed marine areas<\/a>, is a great example of what happens when local communities have recognition and power. Here conservation delivers both social and ecological benefits.<\/p>\n South Africa has the potential to do something similar to Madagascar. It has laws that recognise communities to establish and manage conservation areas. But the country is yet to declare a community-conserved area in the coastal and marine realm.<\/p>\n Our respondents highlighted a need for greater government support \u2013 most notably, a more streamlined approach to establishing these initiatives. It needs greater efficiency in concluding land claims and land-use plans. The government needs to recognise that local communities can contribute to both social and ecological objectives.<\/p>\n Other countries in the region have shown how conservation can be more\u00a0inclusive<\/a>. And a recent\u00a0report<\/a>\u00a0found community-conserved areas useful in South Africa, especially in areas of high biodiversity.<\/p>\n This approach can also deliver much needed local economic development. The country needs to embrace this new conservation movement.<\/p>\nThe barriers and enablers<\/h2>\n
\n
Going forward<\/h2>\n